Article 61 of Indian Constitution : Impeachment, Procedure

 4.5/5

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Article 61 of Indian Constitution outlines the procedure for the impeachment of the President of India. It is a critical constitutional provision that ensures the accountability of the highest office in the country. The process is initiated when either House of Parliament brings charges against the President for violation of the Constitution. The article details the steps for presenting and investigating these charges, requiring a two-thirds majority of the total membership of each House for the impeachment to be successful. This provision underscores the checks and balances within the Indian democratic system, safeguarding the Constitution and upholding the rule of law.

Impeachment of the President in Article 61 of Indian Constitution
Grounds for Impeachment in Article 61 of Indian Constitution
Procedure for Impeachment in Article 61 of Indian Constitution
Role of Parliament in Impeachment in Article 61 of Indian Constitution
Investigative Process in Article 61 of Indian Constitution
Impeachment Trial in Parliament in Article 61 of Indian Constitution
Outcome of Impeachment Proceedings in Article 61 of Indian Constitution
Historical Cases of Impeachment in India in Article 61 of Indian Constitution
Frequently Asked Question (FAQs)

Impeachment of the President in Article 61 of Indian Constitution

Impeachment of the President of India:

Impeachment Grounds: The President can be impeached for “violation of the Constitution.”
Initiation of Process: The impeachment process can be initiated in either House of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha).
Notice of Charges: A notice signed by at least one-fourth of the total members of the initiating House must be presented, stating the charges against the President.
Fourteen-Day Notice: A 14-day notice must be given to the President before the charges are formally taken up for consideration.
Two-Thirds Majority: The charges must be approved by a two-thirds majority of the total membership of the initiating House.
Investigation: Once the charges are approved, the other House investigates the allegations. The President has the right to defend themselves during this process.
Second House Approval: If the investigating House also approves the charges by a two-thirds majority, the President is considered impeached.
No Judicial Review: The impeachment process is a parliamentary procedure, and courts do not have the authority to intervene.
Immediate Removal: Upon successful impeachment, the President is immediately removed from office.
First Time Use: No President of India has been impeached to date; it is a power reserved for exceptional circumstances.

Grounds for Impeachment in Article 61 of Indian Constitution

Impeachment of the President of India:

Violation of the Constitution: The primary ground for impeachment is the “violation of the Constitution.”
Breach of Constitutional Duty: Failure to uphold the duties and responsibilities outlined in the Constitution can be considered a violation.
Unconstitutional Acts: Engaging in actions that go against the principles of the Constitution is grounds for impeachment.
Abuse of Power: Misuse of the President’s powers for personal or political gain can lead to impeachment.
Disregard for Laws: Willfully ignoring or violating laws passed by Parliament may be seen as a violation of the Constitution.
Breach of Oath: The President takes an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. Violating this oath is a ground for impeachment.
Interference in Justice: Any attempt to interfere with the judicial process or undermine the independence of the judiciary can be grounds for impeachment.
Corruption or Misconduct: Engaging in corrupt practices or serious misconduct while in office can lead to impeachment.
Undermining Democracy: Actions that threaten the democratic structure of the country may be considered a violation of the Constitution.
Threat to National Security: Any act by the President that endangers the security and integrity of the nation can be grounds for impeachment.

Procedure for Impeachment in Article 61 of Indian Constitution

Procedure for the impeachment of the President of India:

Initiation of Process: The impeachment process can begin in either the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha, the two Houses of Parliament.
Notice of Charges: A written notice specifying the charges must be signed by at least one-fourth of the total members of the initiating House.
Fourteen-Day Notice: After the notice is given, a 14-day period must pass before the charges can be formally considered.
Initial Approval: The House where the charges are initiated must pass the resolution by a two-thirds majority of its total membership.
Transfer to Other House: If the resolution is passed, the charges are sent to the other House of Parliament for investigation.
Investigation Process: The second House investigates the charges, during which the President has the right to present a defense.
Final Approval: After the investigation, the second House must also approve the charges by a two-thirds majority of its total membership.
Impeachment and Removal: If the charges are approved by both Houses, the President is considered impeached and is immediately removed from office.
No Judicial Intervention: The impeachment process is exclusively a parliamentary matter, with no involvement from the judiciary.
Historical Note: To date, no President of India has been impeached, making it a significant and rare constitutional procedure.

Role of Parliament in Impeachment in Article 61 of Indian Constitution

Role of Parliament in Impeachment

1. Initiation:

Any House: The impeachment process can be initiated in either the Lok Sabha (House of the People) or the Rajya Sabha (Council of States).

2. Notice and Charges:

Notice: A notice detailing the charges must be signed by at least one-fourth of the total members of the initiating House.

3. Consideration:

First House: The initiating House must pass the impeachment resolution by a two-thirds majority of its total membership.

4. Investigation:

Second House: If the first House approves the resolution, it is sent to the other House for investigation.

5. Defense:

President’s Rights: During the investigation in the second House, the President has the right to defend themselves against the charges.

6. Final Approval:

Second House: The second House must also pass the impeachment resolution by a two-thirds majority of its total membership.

7. Impeachment:

Removal: If both Houses approve the resolution by the required majority, the President is impeached and removed from office.

Powers and Functions of Both Houses

1. Lok Sabha:

Initiation: Can initiate the impeachment process by presenting the notice and charges.
First Resolution: Must pass the impeachment resolution with a two-thirds majority of its total membership.

2. Rajya Sabha:

Investigation: Handles the investigation of the charges after the Lok Sabha’s resolution.
Final Resolution: Must also pass the impeachment resolution with a two-thirds majority of its total membership.

Special Majority Requirement

1. Two-Thirds Majority:

Total Membership: Both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha require a two-thirds majority of their total membership, not just the members present and voting, to approve the impeachment resolution.

2. Purpose:

Safeguard: The special majority ensures that impeachment is a serious and well-considered process, requiring significant consensus among parliamentarians.

Investigative Process in Article 61 of Indian Constitution

Breakdown of the investigative process :

1. Initiation:

Start of Investigation: The process begins once the Lok Sabha passes the impeachment resolution and sends it to the Rajya Sabha (or vice versa).

2. Formation of Committee:

Inquiry Committee: The House receiving the resolution forms an Inquiry Committee to investigate the charges against the President.

3. Committee Members:

Selection: The Inquiry Committee is composed of members appointed by the House. The composition is usually decided by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

4. Committee Role:

Investigation: The Committee’s role is to examine the charges and gather evidence related to the allegations.

5. Hearings:

Evidence Collection: The Committee holds hearings where evidence is presented, and the President has the opportunity to defend themselves.

6. Legal Counsel:

Representation: The President may be represented by legal counsel during the hearings to ensure a fair defense.

7. Report Preparation:

Findings: After completing the investigation, the Committee prepares a detailed report based on the evidence and hearings.

8. Submission of Report:

Report to House: The Inquiry Committee submits its report to the House that formed it (Rajya Sabha or Lok Sabha).

9. Consideration of Report:

Discussion: The House discusses the report and decides whether to proceed with the impeachment based on the Committee’s findings.

10. Resolution Vote:

Final Vote: If the report supports the charges, the House votes on whether to approve the impeachment resolution. A two-thirds majority is required for the resolution to pass.

Impeachment Trial in Parliament in Article 61 of Indian Constitution

Impeachment Trial in the Rajya Sabha

1. Receipt of Resolution:

Transfer from Lok Sabha: If the impeachment resolution is passed by the Lok Sabha, it is sent to the Rajya Sabha for investigation.

2. Formation of Inquiry Committee:

Committee Creation: The Rajya Sabha forms an Inquiry Committee to investigate the charges against the President.

3. Committee Investigation:

Evidence Collection: The Committee examines evidence, holds hearings, and considers the allegations presented.

4. No Appeal:

Final Decision: The decision of the Rajya Sabha is final in the impeachment process, and there is no further appeal.

5. President’s Presence:

Defense Opportunity: The President is given the opportunity to be present during the hearings to defend themselves against the charges.

6. Legal Representation:

Counsel: The President may be represented by legal counsel during the proceedings to ensure their right to a fair defense.

7. Report Preparation:

Findings: The Inquiry Committee prepares a report based on the investigation and submits it to the Rajya Sabha.

8. Report Discussion:

Debate: The Rajya Sabha debates the findings of the Inquiry Committee and the merits of the impeachment resolution.

9. Final Resolution:

Vote: The Rajya Sabha votes on the impeachment resolution. A two-thirds majority of the total membership is required to pass it.

10. Outcome:

Approval: If the resolution is approved, the President is considered impeached and removed from office.

Right to Defense for the President

1. Fair Hearing:

Opportunity to Defend: The President has the right to present their case and respond to the charges during the investigation.

2. Legal Representation:

Counsel Access: The President can engage legal counsel to represent and defend them throughout the impeachment process.

3. Presentation of Evidence:

Evidence Submission: The President can submit evidence and call witnesses in their defense.

4. Cross-Examination:

Questioning: The President has the right to cross-examine witnesses and challenge evidence presented against them.

5. Equal Treatment:

Impartiality: The proceedings must be conducted impartially, ensuring that the President’s defense is given fair consideration.

6. Right to Address:

Addressing the House: The President can address the Rajya Sabha during the impeachment trial to argue their case.

7. Review of Evidence:

Evidence Assessment: The Inquiry Committee reviews all evidence, including that presented by the President.

8. Transparency:

Public Proceedings: The impeachment process is conducted openly, providing transparency and ensuring fairness.

9. Detailed Report:

Report Content: The Committee’s report must detail the evidence and arguments from both sides, including the President’s defense.

10. No Prejudice:

Impartial Verdict: The final decision on the impeachment resolution must be based on the evidence and not on any preconceived notions.

Outcome of Impeachment Proceedings in Article 61 of Indian Constitution

Outcome of Impeachment Proceedings

Possible Results

1. Successful Impeachment:

Removal from Office: If both Houses of Parliament pass the impeachment resolution by a two-thirds majority, the President is removed from office.

2. Dismissal of Charges:

Resolution Rejected: If the impeachment resolution is not approved by either House, the President remains in office.

3. Resignation:

Preemptive Resignation: In some cases, the President might resign before the conclusion of the impeachment process, rendering the proceedings moot.

4. Suspension:

No Provisions: The Constitution does not provide for suspension of the President during impeachment; the President remains in office until the process is concluded.

5. Interim Arrangements:

Acting President: During the impeachment process, the Vice President or another designated official may perform the President’s duties if the office is vacated.

Implications of Removal

1. Vacancy in the Office:

Election of New President: The removal creates a vacancy, and a new Presidential election must be held to elect a successor.

2. Impact on Governance:

Administrative Changes: The removal of a President may lead to changes in the administration and government policies, depending on the successor’s priorities.

3. Legal and Constitutional Precedents:

Historical Significance: The impeachment and removal of a President set important constitutional and legal precedents for future cases.

4. Political Ramifications:

Political Fallout: The removal may cause significant political upheaval, affecting parties, leaders, and public opinion.

5. Public Trust:

Trust in Institutions: The impeachment process and its outcome can impact public trust in the political and legal institutions of the country.

6. Legal Consequences:

Further Investigations: The removal of a President might lead to further legal investigations or charges depending on the nature of the allegations.

7. Presidential Benefits:

Post-Removal Benefits: The removed President may lose certain post-office benefits and privileges, depending on the provisions in place.

8. International Perception:

Global Image: The impeachment of a President can affect the country’s international image and relations with other nations.

9. Political Stability:

Stability Concerns: The removal may impact the political stability of the country, influencing both domestic and international stability.

10. Institutional Integrity:

Strengthening Democracy: The successful and fair conduct of impeachment proceedings can strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law.

Historical Cases of Impeachment in India in Article 61 of Indian Constitution

Historical Cases of Impeachment in India

Instances of Impeachment Attempts

1. First Impeachment Attempt (1969):

Background: The first significant impeachment attempt in India was against President Zakir Husain, who was accused of having violated the Constitution.
Outcome: This attempt did not progress as President Husain resigned due to health reasons before the impeachment could be formally processed.

2. Second Impeachment Attempt (1979):

Background: An attempt was made to impeach President V.V. Giri. The charges were related to misconduct and failure to uphold the Constitution.
Outcome: The impeachment motion was withdrawn, and no formal impeachment proceedings were conducted against President Giri.

3. Third Attempt (1990):

Background: There were discussions and motions to impeach President R. Venkataraman due to allegations of corruption.
Outcome: The attempts were unsuccessful, and no formal impeachment process was initiated.

Lessons Learned

1. Stringent Requirements:

Two-Thirds Majority: The requirement for a two-thirds majority in both Houses makes it challenging to successfully impeach a President. This high threshold ensures that impeachment is pursued only in serious cases.

2. Political Consensus:

Need for Consensus: Successful impeachment requires substantial political consensus across parties, reflecting the need for broad agreement on the severity of the charges.

3. Legal and Procedural Clarity:

Adherence to Process: The impeachment process requires strict adherence to constitutional and procedural norms. Clear guidelines help maintain fairness and integrity in the process.

4. Role of Public Opinion:

Impact of Public Sentiment: Public opinion and media scrutiny can influence the political dynamics surrounding impeachment, although the process itself is a parliamentary matter.

5. Significance of Resignation:

Resignation as an Alternative: In some cases, Presidents may choose to resign before the impeachment process is fully pursued, impacting the course of proceedings.

6. Judicial Independence:

Non-Intervention by Courts: The judiciary does not intervene in impeachment proceedings, highlighting the separation of powers and the importance of parliamentary procedures.

7. Political Stability:

Impact on Stability: Impeachment attempts and proceedings can have significant effects on political stability and governance, underlining the need for careful consideration before initiating such actions.

8. Importance of Evidence:

Need for Strong Evidence: The success of impeachment depends on the strength and credibility of the evidence against the President, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigation.

9. Institutional Integrity:

Strengthening Institutions: Even unsuccessful attempts contribute to the strengthening of democratic institutions by ensuring that the process is transparent and accountable.

10. Public Trust:

Maintaining Trust: The handling of impeachment cases impacts public trust in political and constitutional institutions, making it crucial to conduct proceedings with fairness and integrity.